Her Film Analysis
By: Sofia Corona-Santoyo, Sabina Costea, Myriam Briand, & Jessica B. Morris
(image:http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-review-of-her-by-ray-kurzweil)
Retrieved
from rogerebert.com written by Glenn Kenny:
Year Released: 2013
Running Time: 126 min
Director: Spike Jonez
Screenwriter: Spike Jonez
Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Scarlett Johansson, Amy Adams,
Rooney Mara, Olivia Wilde
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzV6mXIOVl4
Theodore Twombly, is a writer
living in the near future, where the dependency on digital technology has
significantly increased. After having gone through a tough separation, Theodore
is left unsatisfied, bored, and “disconnected” from the world. Intrigued by an
ad he sees on his way home from work, he decides to sign up for an artificially
intelligent operating system personalized for him. The OS, Samantha, and
Theodore become an important part of each other's lives, as she helps him feel
better about himself and life in general and he helps her learn about the world
outside of the computer. They eventually fall in love and for a while, they
have a good relationship. Eventually, they both begin to have their doubts,
seeing as they live in different worlds and they operate differently. As time
goes on, Theodore becomes increasingly dependent on Samantha, while Sam becomes
increasingly independent as she forms relationships with other artificially
intelligent operating systems and other humans.
Film
Techniques
A large part
of the movie is filmed with the camera at eye-level. The movie
consisted mostly of conversations between Samantha and Theodore through an
earbud, therefore having the camera at eye-level would help the audience feel
like we are there since we normally see each other at eye level in real life.
A significant diegetic sound in the movie
was obviously the dialogue between Sam and Theodore. Since we, the audience,
couldn’t physically see Sam and her facial or bodily expressions, we relied
heavily on her tone of voice to know how she was feeling or what she was
thinking. The only way we could know if Sam was present in the scene was if she
spoke. An
important non-diegetic sound in the movie was the music playing in many of the
scenes of the movie, most significantly the music playing during Theodore and
Samantha’s sex scenes. The
music is soft and romantic, which is attempting to make the scene seem like
wonderful moment, likening it to a passionate sex scene that would happen
between two humans. They are making themselves feel things that they haven’t
felt before. In my opinion the music is used to help aid the moment, since most
humans watching it may feel weird watching and listening to a human having sex
with a computer, which is an example of the uncanny valley.Another important use of music
was the music Samantha would compose for Theodore, which is a diegetic sound.
She would write piano pieces to describe the emotions she would feel. She also used
music to describe there moments together. As they were not able to experience
them together and feel emotions together, she composed music to describe that
to Theodore, such as the song she composed to describe the moment they had
together on the beach.
Since a lot of the movie was filmed
with the same eye-level framing, it eventually got a little boring, but
the use of special techniques really helped distinguish important scenes and
also added some flavor to the movie. An example of this is in the scene where
Theodore is panicking because he cannot find Samantha--the camera shakes as if
someone were just holding it and running with him. The shaking of the camera
creates this unsteadiness in us, the audience, which allows us to feel the
characters stress in the moment. Another example of this is shown in various
scenes where Theodore and Samantha are having a conversation and during these
conversations, Theodore has flashbacks of his ex-wife. With these flashbacks,
we get insight on his thoughts and feelings towards his relationship with her,
as well as things they discussed together. In order to demonstrate that
they were flashbacks, a different filter would be used in those scenes. The
filter would make everything a little bit blurry or it would focus on one thing
and everything else was blurry.
(image: https://www.villagevoice.com/2013/12/17/her-ilove-american-style/)
An important prop used in the movie would be the
earbud. Even before Sam, this earbud was always in his ear. He could listen to
his emails or to his music with it. Later, when Samantha was in his life, this
was their main means of communication, considering that Samantha was not a
physical being. Theodore wasn’t the only one with an earbud. Everyone around
him in the streets seemed to have one too. They were always connected to their
earbuds, but disconnected from each other.
Another
related prop was the camera/communication device. This device is what connected
him with Samantha. She could see through the camera and see what Theodore was
seeing or even see Theodore. Samantha could also send him pictures through this
device. This allowed Theodore to feel like she was there with him He was able
to carry around this object and it was seen as the physical representation of
Samantha, a non-physical consciousness. When Samantha was not connecting to the
communication device, he began to freak out as if he had lost Samantha. This
communication device had become his representation of Samantha; it was
Samantha. It also allowed Samantha to feel like she was there with him. It was
a way for them to share experiences together, such as the picnic they shared
with Theodore’s co-worker and his girlfriend. They sat the communication device
between all of them, as they shared a conversation; the communication device represented
Samantha’s presence. This device was a way for them to share experiences
together… to a certain extent.
Like any film, the setting is
important to set the scene and communicate information that is not directly
given to the audience, like the time period that this film takes
place. The overall setting of the film was in a more modernized city.
Everything looks clean and new. When we see Theodore’s apartment as well as Amy’s
apartment, we see a mix of old and new. The buildings themselves all look clean,
as many of them are made with glass and are shaped in very rectangular
clean-cut shapes, which gives a modern feel to the scenes. However, the
furniture inside the buildings is very colourful and a lot of medium brown wood
is used in the furniture also, which gives a retro feel to the scenes as well.
This indicates that this movie is taking place in the near future, where no drastic
changes have been made except for in technology. This also allows the audience
to connect with the movie and not feel so alienated, like other futuristic
movies may do. We, as the audience, see that in the movie technology has
evolved. Despite that humans will always be humans, wanting love and feeling
heartache. We are able to see this through Theodore and Amy; they look for
emotional connection even in something non-human and are heartbroken when they
lose that connection.
(image:http://variety.com/2013/film/awards/oscar-and-spike-jonzes-her-a-complex-relationship-1200721716/)
Themes
and Issues
This movie revolves around many themes such as love,
sadness, friendship, and loneliness. At first, “Her” appears to be a typical
love story, but going deeper into the movie and connecting it to the themes that come to light, we see that it is so much more. By analyzing the plot of this movie,
it makes sense to see why Theodore, the main character, has a weird connection with a software, where only her voice
can be heard; he is is lonely, desperate and anti-social. For him to have feelings for the OS is justified because
he feels like it’s hard to have a human to human connection but are her
feelings real, knowing that she is only a robot?
This addresses an issue that we face with Social Robots
today; the issue of disconnecting from the world. In a scene in the beginning
of the film, while Theodore is walking on the street, it is seen that everyone
around him and including him is blind to the world around them and connected to
their phone-earbud things. Further disconnection between humans occurs when the
world is introduced to the Operating System. Theodore's OS, Samantha, becomes
his girlfriend and Amy's OS, becomes her trusted companion. The AIs begin to
replace humans and this movie does a good job to show it in a positive and
negative light. While, the character's relationships with the operating systems
show positive outcomes in their lives, like helping them move on from tough
issues going on in their lives, they also show negative outcomes. They become
increasingly dependent on their technologies and in the end, they are abandoned
by them, leaving them in the same lonely state they were in when they first met
their AIs.
Theodore is intrigued by this OS because he is lonely, but
in reality, he only isolates himself more as he becomes more and more dependent
on this technology. This also addresses the fact that we are
human and we are sentient and complex being. We are capable of forming
empathetic relationships, while robots may not be able to do this. A frequently
asked question will robots have the ability to feel and experience or are they
just programmed to act this way. We may mistaken this programming for a true
relationship, which causes further issues for humans. We may forget what a true
empathetic and emotional may be like; we become more like robots than humans,
something we call moral deskilling.
1539 words
Film
Review
This movie is described
as a “lonely-guy movie” (Liam), as it follows the stereotype; Theodore lives
alone in his apartment after he and his wife separated and he works in an
office. It shows his path of finding love, once again, and his own
mental evolution after his relationship with his ex-wife that left him
emotionally damaged. This movie was able to capture the beautiful experience of
heartbreak and love, all together at once. By Joaquin Phoenix’s good acting, it
was easy to catch his vulnerability when he faces certain situations regarding
his ex-wife or when he went on the blind date. One of the strength of the movie
was how easily the audience could interpret and observe the characters
emotions. Either it was by their face expression, their body posture or their
voice, it was easy to perceive sentiments of sadness, desperation, happiness,
so goes on. Even during their sexual intercourse over the phone, it seemed
extremely real. Not only this seemed real, but even the technology advances
seem realistic enough to be used in our own society. It was easy to compare our
technological improvement, compared to theirs and see where our inventions
could lead to, in the future.
We found that an apparent weakness in
the movie is the monotony of it. From time to time, it felt like the movie
wasn’t going anywhere, leaving us with an “and…?” marked on our face. We were always
waiting for something to happen, but then nothing would happen. There was no
element of surprise, whatsoever. We also go a little disappointed towards the
end when we thought that Samantha was going to show up as a physical
representation; a robot in a human body, but instead, she only disappeared,
searching for her own faith and knowledge as an artificial intelligence. Though
the movie had no intense climax, seeing that a typical guy fell in love with an
OS; a relationship out of the ordinary, really spiced up the whole
stereotypical kind of movie of a lonely-guy (Liam).
Connection
to Course Content
In class, we have been learning about social robots.
Much like the social robot we discussed in class, HERB, Sam is able to grow
through her experience. Though Sam does not have a physical robot body that
allows her to take on physical roles, she can still be labeled as a social
robot. She not only takes care of everything on Theodore’s computer, but she
also takes on the role of a girlfriend in his life, which would usually be
taken on by a human. She is however, much more advanced than the social robots
we learned about in class, because she has the ability to feel emotions, such
as love and anger. However, this leads to asking ourselves “Is she really
experiencing those emotions or is she programmed to feel those emotions?”
This brings up the concept of selfhood that
we also learned in class. Though our first reaction would be to acknowledge
that like Siri on our iPhone, Sam is probably programmed into being
“self-aware” and being able to say “I am Samantha”. However, then we realized
that she asks herself this same question: “Are these feelings even real? Or are they
just programming?” (Jonze). This suggests the possibility that she is able to reflect on her
experiences and if this were the possibility then she would demonstrate what is
a self-aware self. She experiences and there is something like to be Samantha
the operating system. She also demonstrates a self-aware self when she says “what makes me me
is my ability to grow through my experiences. Basically, in every moment I'm
evolving, just like you” (Jonze). Much like us, she gains wisdom and grows
through experiences she has.
Lastly, the movie also brings up the
concept of personhood. At first, Theodore does not think of Samantha as a
person. Whenever he and Samantha begin to have a deep conversation, he reminds
himself and her that she is a robot, and diminishes her to solely a computer
that does not have issue or emotions. Their relationship is primarily based on
him as they mostly talk about the issues in his life. However, as the movie
goes on Samantha begins to develop a voice, who is has equal regard in the
relationship. He begins to acknowledge that she too can have feelings and she
is not only a computer and therefore listens and treats her as though she was
his equal. However, personhood is much trickier than this as it also takes into
account society’s opinion, which we see when Theodore tells his wife about
Samantha. She ridicules him for his relationship with the OS and accuses him of
not being able to “handle
real emotions” (Jonze), as if his relationship could not be considered a real
one.
(image: http://www.robotbutt.com/2014/07/29/the-comedy-of-her/)
Questions to get you thinking:
1.Was Samantha really sentient or were her“feelings” just programmed
responses?
2. If you were living in a future where operating systems
(OS), which are computer programs similar to Siri, were artificially
intelligent causing them to have consciousness, feelings, and talk the way
humans would, would you ever consider befriending or even having a romantic
relationship with an OS?
3. If people started to have relationships with operating systems, how
would it affect the way we interact with one another?
Extra Information
We chose
this website because the article talks about how you perceive yourself. It also
answers common questions people have about selfhood. This article relates
perfectly to our movie “Her” in the sense that we as humans with bodies and
flesh are still unsure of what selfhood means, how it works, and we all have
different perceptions of ourselves. Just like how Samantha is unsure of what
her “self” consists of considering she is an AI.
We chose
this second website because it talks about artificial intelligence and about
Siri’s consciousness. This article in particular talks about Siri, how she is
aware of what is going and knows how to respond to certain situations. It also
covers how scientist have been wanting to do studies on Siri for quite some
time now. This article relates to the movie “Her” because although Samantha is
more evolved then Siri, but it is the same concept. Samantha was evolving
throughout the movie, but she was evolving by herself through different
interactions she was having with all the different people. Samantha also
developed so sort of “feelings” which Siri also claims she has.
To answer the third question, if people were to start having relationships with operating systems it would definitely have a major effect on our human relationships. It brings up the question of moral deskilling. If we as humans start to become more and more accustomed to interactions with programs and less with other humans, then will our ability to interact with one another be hindered? From my perspective yes. Theo and Samantha's relationship portrays this perfectly. At the beginning everything is wonderful for them and all is well, but as the film progresses, cracks in the foundation of their relationship start to appear leading to the end of them as a couple. We can make operating systems sound like humans, making us believe that they are like us, tricking us into believing that a semblance to a "real human connection" is being made; much like Theo with Samantha. At the end of the day though, they remain programs, and not living and breathing human beings. They are programmed to an extent to please the 'master' (for lack of better word) and therefore of course one would most likely prefer their company over that of another human. Humans are naturally social beings; by estranging ourselves with one another and looking more towards operating systems, one by one we will be isolating ourselves. Perhaps in turn, regressing to an asocial state of thinking.
ReplyDeleteTo answer the first question, I personally believe that Samantha was mainly programmed to act a certain way, given one of the first questions that he is asked when Theo initialized the program was "what was your relationship like with your mother." Which indicated that she would therefore act as some kind of mother figure. Also, she seemed to be an "extension" of Theodore's self. He was unable to maintain a relationship with his ex-wife and he mentioned that his relationship with his mother was quite unstable. In addition, he messed up the blind date his friends planned for him. So I think that Samantha was programmed to analyze Theodore and to develop a certain personality according to his way of living and socializing..
ReplyDelete"Her" resembles my team's movie "Blade Runner", through the topic/use of social robots. There are many similarities between the two movies concerning this topic, such as questioning how they would fit into society. In "Her", social robots seem to have more of a "social" element to them, as Sam helps the main character with relationship and personal issues, whereas in "Blade Runner", they kill people. In both instances, questions regarding sentience are provoked and the inclusion of social robots stands out as a major course connection observed within the story.
ReplyDeleteIn response to the third question, I do think Samantha has a self-aware self. The self-aware self can represent itself. It is the subject of experience but can also be the object of its experience. It can reflect. It can introspect. It knows it exists. It is an “I” with symbols of an “I”. It can represent its own consciousness. Since she is an operating system, her responses to the human voice were programmed to sound as realistic as possible, which shows in the different ways she speaks to Theodore. Theodore even points this out during the movie when he asks her why she is taking a deep breath if she doesn’t even need to breathe. Her response to him was that she didn’t know why she did it, but that she had heard him do it before and imitated him for them to be able to relate to each other more. This shows that Samantha is programmed to act and sound exactly like a human in order for them to be able to feel like they can relate to an OS. However, even though her responses to the human voice are programmed, her “thoughts” are definitely not considering she was aware of her position in the world and believed that there was more out there for her. This caused her and all the other operating systems, who were “feeling” the same way she was, to leave the dimension they were in when they were on Earth with humans, proving that they do have self-aware selves.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I have not seen this movie, the blog has shown that it has connections from class content in the movie “Her”, the topic of self aware self throughout the movie. For instance, it is written in the blog that Samantha verbally acknowledges that she grows and evolves through her experiences. This shows that its is reflecting on its own experiences and that she can represent her as an “I”. Proving that even though Samantha is a robot, she has the capacity to be self aware of herself. The blog was very easy to understand and well written good job.
ReplyDeleteIn response to the third question, i do think Samantha has a self-aware self. the self-aware self is defined as it can represent itself. it is the subject of experience but can also be the object of its experience. It can reflect. It can introspect. It knows it exists. Since Samantha is an operating system, her responses are programmed and created to sound as human as possible, which allows her to have an intimate relationship with Theodore. I believe that human beings shouldn't have relationships with operating systems, because it will hinder their capability to have a relationship with another human being. since the operating system doesn't portray the reality of having a relationship with another human being. For example, when you talk to an operating system, therefore the responses are programmed to respond to what you want to hear, but on the other hand when you talk to another human being the responses are real and won't tell you what you want to hear but the actual truth of what that persons feels towards you.
ReplyDelete